A systematic review of the early dialogue frameworks used within health technology assessment and their actual adoption from HTA agencies.

Introduction: Early advice in the process of developing health technologies allows manufacturers to plan their production and transfer to health care systems more accurately. This review aims to describe frameworks used within HTA and their current use by HTA Agencies. Material and methods: We carried out a systematic literature review in Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and WoS, including all references published in Spanish and English. This was last updated in March 2022. We extracted all available information regarding the organizations involved, services offered, types of technology, collaborators involved, fees, output and impact. Websites of several HTA organizations and Google were also searched in order to update and complete the information obtained from this generic search. Results: Five-hundred and forty one articles were identified and screened, of which 26 met the eligibility criteria and were selected. Seven of them were non-systematic reviews that described two or more HTA organizations. Ten studies were focused on the advice offered by individual organizations, and eight described the EMA and EUnetHTA parallel or joint advice. We found variations in the technology assessed, services offered, stage of development and costs for advisory services. Conclusions: Early and scientific advice would help manufacturers focus their product development on what is needed for the management of specific diseases. Most of the examples or services found refer to drugs as well as to some medical devices and diagnostics. A common definition of the type of advice that could be offered for different health technologies by HTA bodies to ascertain health care systems and manufacturers' needs, in addition to the timeline in which that advice needs to be given, would help HTA bodies provide the right support at the right time. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020219401, PROSPERO CRD42020219401.

Eficacia y seguridad del rituximab en el tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple: una postura racional en el contexto colombiano / Efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a rational position in the Colombian context

RESUMEN INTRODUCCIÓN: La esclerosis múltiple es una enfermedad neuroinflamatoria, crónica, degenerativa e incurable, asociada a pérdida neuronal, grados crecientes de discapacidad y deterioro cognoscitivo. Su manejo conlleva grandes costos para los sistemas de salud y la sociedad en general. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la eficacia y la seguridad del uso del rituximab en el manejo de la esclerosis múltiple. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Revisión de la literatura y evaluación de la tecnología en salud tipo mini-HTA en red colaborativa con el Comité de Esclerosis Múltiple de la Asociación Colombiana de Neurología y el Instituto Global de Excelencia Clínica. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 27 referencias de texto completo para el análisis de la seguridad y la eficacia del rituximab en el manejo de la esclerosis múltiple. Se utilizaron análisis de costos, indicadores epidemiológicos y estudios pivótales de rituximab. CONCLUSIÓN: La evidencia analizada confirma que la terapia con rituximab es efectiva y segura en el manejo de las formas de esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente (EMRR) y esclerosis múltiple primaria-progresiva (EMPP), con menor tasa de eventos adversos y tasas de interrupción o abandono del tratamiento más bajas que otras terapias modificadoras de la enfermedad (TME).

SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis is a neuroinflammatory, chronic, degenerative, and incurable disease, associated with neuronal loss, increasing degrees of disability, and cognitive control. Its treatment causes great costs for health systems and society in general. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of rituximab in the management of multiple sclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature review and evaluation of mini-HTA type health technology in a collaborative network with the Multiple Sclerosis Committee of the Colombian Association of Neurology and the Global Institute of Clinical Excellence. RESULTS: 27 full-text references were identified for the safety and efficacy analysis of rituximab in the management of multiple sclerosis. Cost analysis, epidemiological indicators, and pivotal studies of rituximab were incorporated into the analysis. CONCLUSION: The evidence analyzed confirms that rituximab therapy is effective and safe in the management of the forms of Recurrent-Remittent Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) and Primary-Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS), with a lower rate of adverse events and discontinuation or withdrawal rates of treatment lower than other disease-modifying therapies.

Toxicodermia as an adverse event in a covid-19 patient: case report

ABSTRACT: Introduction: SARS-COV2 infection, which was initially associated with respiratory manifestations only, can also cause gastrointestinal, kidney, neurological and cardiovascular symptoms according to some reports. Case presentation: A 36-year-old female patient attended the emergency department due to dyspnea, asthenia, adynamia, mild odynophagia. and headache. The patient's medical history included obesity, smoking, and working as a health care worker. Considering the symptoms, antimalarial and antiretroviral treatment was indicated to treat COVID-19, a diagnosis that was confirmed three days after admission. However, on the fourth day of treatment, the patient presented with polydipsia and macular, pruritic, and generalized rash. Due to suspicion of toxicoderma, the treatment was suspended, and the skin condition improved. After 8 days of hospitalization, the patient was discharged with biosecurity recommendations and mandatory isolation for 28 days. Conclusion: The described case is a report of toxicoderma in a patient with COVID-19 under treatment with antiretroviral and antimalarial drugs. Based on the findings, a thorough examination of skin and mucosa of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 will undoubtedly contribute to the correct characterization of this new disease.

RESUMEN Introducción. La infección por SARS-COV2, que en principio se pensó solo causaba manifestaciones respiratorias, también puede ocasionar síntomas gastrointestinales, renales, neurológicos, cardiovasculares e incluso cutáneos según algunos reportes. Presentación del caso. Paciente femenina de 36 años quien asistió al servicio de urgencias por cuadró clínico consistente en disnea, astenia, adinamia, odinofagia leve y cefalea. Como antecedentes de relevancia se registró obesidad, tabaquismo y ocupación como trabajadora de la salud. Dados los síntomas, se indicó tratamiento antimalárico y antirretroviral para tratar COVID-19, diagnóstico que fue confirmado a los tres días de ingreso, pero al cuarto día de instaurado este manejo la mujer presentó polidipsia y rash macular, pruriginoso y generalizado. Por sospecha de toxicodermia, el tratamiento fue suspendido y con esto el cuadro cutáneo mejoró. Luego de 8 días de hospitalización, la paciente recibió el alta, junto con recomendaciones de bioseguridad y confinamiento durante 28 días. Conclusiones. El caso descrito corresponde a un evento de toxicodermia en una paciente con COVID-19 en manejo con antirretroviral y antimalárico. A partir de los hallazgos, se establece que la exploración minuciosa de piel y mucosas en los pacientes con sospecha o diagnóstico confirmado de COVID-19 puede ser de gran ayuda para la correcta caracterización de esta nueva enfermedad.

Consenso Colombiano para la prevención, diagnóstico y manejo de condiciones trombóticas en pacientes adultos con COVID-19: aplicando el Marco de la Evidencia a la Decisión (EtD) GRADE / Colombian consensus for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic conditions in adult patients with COVID-19: applying GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) Frameworks

resumen está disponible en el texto completo

Abstract Recent studies have reported the occurrence of thrombotic phenomena or coagulopathy in patients with COVID-19. There are divergent positions regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of these phenomena, and current clinical practice is based solely on deductions by extension from retrospective studies, case series, observational studies, and international guidelines developed prior to the pandemic. In this context, the aim was to generate a group of recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and management of thrombotic complications associated with COVID-19. Methods: A rapid guidance was carried out applying the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks and an iterative participation system, with statistical and qualitative analysis. Results: 31 clinical recommendations were generated focused on: a) Coagulation tests in symptomatic adults with suspected infection or confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection; b) Thromboprophylaxis in adults diagnosed with COVID-19 (Risk scales, thromboprophylaxis for outpatient, in-hospital management, and duration of thromboprophylaxis after discharge from hospitalization), c) Diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic complications, and d) Management of people with previous indication of anticoagulant agents. Conclusions: Recommendations of this consensus guide clinical decision-making regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of thrombotic phenomena in patients with COVID-19, and represent an agreement that will help decrease the dispersion in clinical practices according to the challenge imposed by the pandemic.

Eficacia y seguridad de la cloroquina, la hidroxicloroquina y la azitromicina en pacientes con COVID-19. Resumen de evidencia / Efficacy and safety of chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in patients with COVID-19: Summary of evidence

Resumen Introducción: hasta el momento, no se ha demostrado la efectividad de ningún tratamiento para afrontar la emergencia sanitaria por COVID-19. Objetivo: presentar la evidencia disponible respecto a la eficacia y seguridad del uso de cloroquina, hidroxicloroquina y azitromicina en la profilaxis y el manejo de pacientes con COVID-19. Materiales y métodos: se realizó una revisión de la literatura en las bases de datos MEDLINE, Scopus y PubMed sobre publica- ciones que registraran el uso de cloroquina, hidroxicloroquina y azitromicina en pacientes con COVID-19. Resultados: se seleccionaron 12 publicaciones que incluyeron revisiones rápidas de literatura, estudios observacionales y ensayos clínicos. No se encontró información sobre la profilaxis con cloroquina, hidroxicloroquina ni azitromicina para SARS-CoV-2. Los eventos adversos reportados incluyeron emesis, dolor abdominal, náuseas, diarrea, erupción cutánea y picazón. Conclusiones: según la evidencia recopilada el uso de hidroxicloroquina o de cloroquina sola o en combinación con azitromicina en pacientes con COVID-19 no ha mostrado beneficio. Además, cada uno de estos esquemas de tratamiento se asocia con un mayor riesgo de muerte y de episodios de arritmias. En síntesis, la efectividad de estos medicamentos sigue sin estar esclarecida, por lo cual se sugiere evitar su uso en el tratamiento de personas con infección por SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19.

Abstract Introduction: The COVID-19 disease is a health emergency; treatment has not yet been proven. Objective: To present the available evidence of efficacy and safety of the use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in the prophylaxis and management of patients with COVID-19. Methods: A rapid literature review was performed; we consulted Medline, scopus and pubmed databases. Results: Eleven publications were included including rapid literature reviews, observational studies, and clinical trials. No data were found studying prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin for SARS-CoV-2. Reports of adverse events include episodes of emesis, abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhea, rash, and itching. Conclusions: The evidence collected suggests that the use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in patients with COVID-19, could abnormal electrocardiogram and increased risk of mortality in-hospital. The effectiveness remains unclear.

Uso de resúmenes de evidencia para informar el tratamiento farmacológico de personas con sospecha o diagnóstico de infección respiratoria por SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 / Use of evidence summaries to inform pharmacological treatment of people with suspected or diagnosedSARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 respiratory infection

Resumen Introducción: debido a la emergencia del coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 desde diciembre del 2019, se ha generado un gran volumen de producción científica, en algún caso incierta o controvertida especialmente en el manejo farmacológico de los pacientes con esta infección; por lo tanto, se considera relevante buscar alternativas metodológicas para realizar su síntesis rigurosa, sistemática y de calidad, pero con menor tiempo de ejecución y menor costo. Objetivo: presentar la evidencia disponible respecto al manejo farmacológico de personas con sospecha o diagnóstico de infección respiratoria por SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) utilizando el método de revisiones sistemáticas rápidas (RS-R) en medicamentos poten- cialmente eficaces para su manejo. Metodología: se realizó una búsqueda sistemática y estructurada en Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Clinical trials y Google Scholar en inglés. Los estudios incluidos fueron guías de práctica clínica, consensos, revisiones sistemáticas, metaanálisis, ensayos clínicos y otros estudios primarios. La búsqueda y extracción de datos se realizó por múltiples revisores, pero ninguna fue pareada. Resultados: dieciseis preguntas de interés clínico fueron resueltas, relacionadas con el uso en COVID-19 de lopinavir/ ritonavir, nelfinavir, oseltamivir, remdesivir, ribavirina, teicoplanina, umifenovir, favipiravir, tocilizumab, ivermectina y plasma convaleciente; también se evaluó el uso de medicamentos de soporte e incluidos en el manejo como la dexametasona, así como el uso concomitante de medicamentos que generaron dudas como son los AINES, los IECA y los ARA II. Conclusiones: los resúmenes de evidencia se muestran dentro del escenario de la pandemia como una buena alternativa metodológica para ofrecer información de calidad a corto plazo para los tomadores de decisiones.

Abstract Introduction: Due to the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus since December 2019, a large volume of scientific production has been generated, in some cases uncertain or controversial, especially in the pharmacological management of patients with this infection; therefore, it is considered a relevant search for methodological alternatives to carry out its rigorous, systematic and quality synthesis, but with less execution time and lower cost. Objective: To present the available evidence regarding the pharmacological management of people with suspected or diagnosed respiratory SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) using the method of rapid systematic reviews (RS-R) in potentially effective drugs for their management. Methodology: A systematic and structured search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Clinical trials and Google Scholar in English. Studies included clinical practice guidelines, consensus, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials, and other primary studies. Data search and extraction were performed by multiple reviewers, but none were paired. Results: Sixteen questions of clinical interest were resolved, related to the use in COVID-19 of lopinavir/ritonavir, nelfinavir, oseltamivir, remdesivir, ribavirin, teicoplanin, umifenovir, favipiravir, tocilizumab, ivermectin, convalescent plasma; the use of support management drugs such as dexamethasone were also evaluated, as well as the concomitant use of drugs that generated doubts, such as NSAIDs, ACEis, and ARA IIs. Conclusions: Summaries of evidence are within the pandemic scenario as a good methodological alternative to offer quality information in the short term for decision-makers.

Consenso colombiano para la prevención, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de condiciones trombóticas en adultos con COVID-19: aplicando el Marco de la Evidencia a la Decisión (EtD) GRADE / Colombian consensus for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic conditions in adults with COVID-19: applying GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) Frameworks

Introducción estudios recientes han reportado fenómenos trombóticos o coagulopatía en pacientes con COVID-19. Hay posiciones divergentes en cuanto a la prevención, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de estos fenómenos, y la práctica clínica actual está basada únicamente en deducciones por extensión a partir de estudios retrospectivos, series de casos, estudios observacionales y guías internacionales desarrolladas previas a la pandemia. Objetivo establecer una serie de recomendaciones sobre prevención, diagnóstico y manejo de las complicaciones trombóticas asociadas a COVID-19. Métodos se desarrolló una guía rápida en la que se aplicó el marco de la evidencia a la decisión (EtD) de GRADE y un sistema de participación iterativo, con análisis estadísticos y cualitativos de sus resultados. Resultados se generaron 31 recomendaciones clínicas enfocadas a: a) Pruebas de coagulación en adultos sintomáticos con sospecha de infección o infección confirmada por SARS-CoV-2; b) Tromboprofilaxis en personas adultas con diagnóstico de COVID-19 (escalas de riesgo, tromboprofilaxis de manejo ambulatorio, intrahospitalario y duración de tromboprofilaxis después del egreso de hospitalización), c) Diagnóstico y tratamiento de las complicaciones trombóticas y d) Manejo de personas con indicación previa a usar agentes anticoagulantes. Conclusiones las recomendaciones clínicas de este consenso orientan la toma de decisiones clínicas respecto a prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento de fenómenos trombóticos en pacientes con COVID-19, y representan un acuerdo que ayudará a disminuir la dispersión en las prácticas clínicas acorde con el desafío que impone la pandemia.

Abstract Introduction: recent studies have reported the occurrence of thrombotic phenomena or coagulopathy in patients with COVID-19. There are divergent positions regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of these phenomena, and current clinical practice is based solely on deductions by extension from retrospective studies, case series, observational studies, and international guidelines developed prior to the pandemic. Objective: to generate a group of recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and management of thrombotic complications associated with COVID-19. Methods: a rapid guidance was carried out applying the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks and an iterative participation system, with statistical and qualitative analysis. Results: 31 clinical recommendations were generated focused on: a) Coagulation tests in symptomatic adults with suspected infection or confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection; b) Thromboprophylaxis in adults diagnosed with COVID-19 (Risk scales, thromboprophylaxis for outpatient, in-hospital management, and duration of thromboprophylaxis after discharge from hospitalization), c) Diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic complications, and d) Management of people with previous indication of anticoagulant agents. Conclusions: recommendations of this consensus guide clinical decision-making regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of thrombotic phenomena in patients with COVID-19, and represent an agreement that will help decrease the dispersion in clinical practices according to the challenge imposed by the pandemic.

Recomendaciones para el uso racional de la prueba 25-hidroxivitamina D Resumen de política

está disponible en el texto completo

The exponential increase in the request for laboratory tests of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D or [25 (OH) D has ignited the alarms and generated a strong call for attention, since it may reflect deficiencies in the standardization of clinical practice and in the use non-systematic scientific evidence for decision-making in real life, which allows to analyze the indications of the test, its frequency, interpretation and even to assess the impact for health systems, especially when contrasted with the minimum or almost. No effects of the strategy of screening or supplying indiscriminately to the general population, without considering a comprehensive clinical assessment of risks and needs of people. From a purely public health impact point of view, the consequence of massive and unspecified requests is affecting most of the health systems and institutions at the global level. The primary studies that determined average population intake values have been widely used in the formulation of recommendations in Clinical Practice Guidelines, but unfortunately misinterpreted as cut points to diagnose disease and allow the exaggerated prescription of nutritional substitution. The coefficient of variation in routine tests to measure blood levels of 25 (OH) D is high (28%), decreasing the overall accuracy of the test and simultaneously, increasing both the falsely high and falsely low values. The most recent scientific evidence analyzes and seriously questions the usefulness and the real effect of the massive and indiscriminate practice of prescribing vitamin D without an exhaustive risk analysis. The available evidence is insufficient to recommend a general substitution of vitamin D to prevent fractures, falls, changes in bone mineral density, incidence of cardiovascular diseases, cerebrovascular disease, neoplasms and also to modify the growth curve of mothers' children. They received vitamin D as a substitute during pregnancy. The recommendations presented in the document are based on the critical analysis of current evidence and the principles of good clinical practice and invite to consider a rational use of 25 (OH) D tests in the context of a clinical practice focused on people and a comprehensive assessment of needs and risks. The principles of good practice suggest that clinicians may be able to justify that the results of the 25 (OH) D test strongly influence and define clinical practice and modify the outcomes that interest people and impact their health and wellness. Currently there is no clarity on how to interpret the results, and the relationship between symptoms and 25 (OH) D levels, which may not be consistent with the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency reported. For this reason, it is suggested to review the rationale of the request for tests for systematic monitoring of levels of 25 (OH) D or in all cases where substitution is performed. Consider the use of 25 (OH) D tests within the comprehensive evaluation of people with suspicion or confirmation of the following conditions: rickets, osteomalacia, osteoporosis, hyper or hypoparathyroidism, malabsorption syndromes, sarcopenia, metabolic bone disease.